Floyd Mayweather Jr. Stripped of WBO Title Won Against Manny Pacquiao: ‘It’s A Complete Disgrace’

By Isaiah Narciso
Manny Pacquiao vs Floyd Mayweather rematch

Boxing champion Floyd Mayweather fought Manny Pacquiao and won the welterweight title in a May 2 matchup dubbed "the fight of the century." However, the World Boxing Organization decided to strip Mayweather's title away from him on Monday thanks to the organization's rules.

The WBO released an official statement that explained why the organization decided to vacate Mayweather's welterweight championship title. The organization cited comments that Mayweather made in a press conference conducted after the fight on May 2 as part of its decision.

"Mr. Mayweather spoke at length about affording the opportunity to other fighters, particularly those of a younger generation and specifically stated that 'Other fighters need to get a chance' and 'I'm not greedy. It's time to let other fighters fight for the belt,'" WBO wrote.

The boxing organization referred to its rules in vacating Mayweather's title. They asked him to "relinquish his WBA/WBC 154 lb. title."

"No WBO Champion may hold a non-WBO Championship in a weight class that is different from the weight class of his WBO Championship," the organization wrote.

Sean Gregory of Time explained why the WBO made that decision against Mayweather. The boxer would have two weeks to file an appeal.

"In other words, the WBO can't recognize Mayweather as its welterweight champ so long as he keeps on to the super-welterweight division titles he holds from the WBA and WBC," Gregory wrote. "Mayweather refused to vacate his other titles by a July 3 deadline, and pay the WBO a $200,000 sanctioning fee. So the WBO stripped Mayweather of his welterweight title."

Gregory then addressed the question of whether the WBO's decision would affect the outcome of the Mayweather-Pacquiao fight.

"Not at all," Gregory wrote. "Mayweather is still the WBA and WBC welterweight champ. The fight was still a boring fight."

Gregory added that the revenue stream from that fight, which set many financial records, would not be affected either. He also thought it would not impact Mayweather's boxing legacy.

"Mayweather's troubling domestic violence history will carry much, much more weight on people's judgments of him than any bureaucratic snafu," Gregory wrote. "This whole mess just captures the trouble with boxing: there's no unified leadership, no organizational structure to push the sport into the future, and attract new passionate fans."

Representatives from Mayweather's camp made their displeasure with the WBO known to Dan Rafael of ESPN. One of them included Mayweather Promotions CEO Leonard Ellerbe.

"It's a complete disgrace," Ellerbe said. "Floyd will decide what, or if any, actions he will take. But in the meantime he's enjoying a couple of hundred million he made from his last outing and this has zero impact on anything he does."

Ellerbe added that Mayweather is probably unfazed by the WBO's decision.

"Floyd Mayweather has a great deal of respect for each and every organization, as he has always had in his 19-year career, but he will not be dictated to by any organization or person as it relates to his decision making," Ellerbe said.

According to Ellerbe, the boxer has not decided yet if he plans to appeal.

"We have the best attorney in the game, John Hornewer, and we are fully aware of what our rights are," Ellerbe said. "Floyd will decide what he wants to do."

Although the WBO stripped Mayweather of his title, the organization acknowledged his storied boxing career.

"The WBO has the utmost respect for Floyd Mayweather Jr. and all that he has accomplished during his storied career," WBO wrote. "Mr. Mayweather has always agreed with and understood that world championships have both privileges and responsibilities and that status as WBO champion is subject to and conditioned on compliance with the WBO rules and regulations."

  • ‘Wang Mingdao’s Diary’ reproduction highlights complexities of contemporary Chinese Christianity

    On December 9, the China Graduate School of Theology (中国神学研究院) hosted a public lecture titled “A Courageous Witness in the Times—Launch of Wang Mingdao (王明道)’s Diary.” The lecture, themed “Faith Patterns in Beijing’s Christian Churches Through the Lens of Wang Mingdao’s Diary,” featured Dr. Ni Buxiao (倪步晓), Associate Director and Assistant Professor at the Christian Faith and Chinese Culture Research Center of Alliance Bible Seminary (建道神学院), as the keynote speaker.

  • Floating library ‘Doulos Hope’ arrives in Taiwan; spreading love and hope from a former cruise ship

    Doulos Hope, the international floating book fair ship, has returned to Taiwan and is now docked at Kaohsiung Port, open to the public from December 18, 2024, to January 12, 2025. Originally built in 1991 and renovated in 2022, the ship features over 2,000 books on various topics, including faith, science, and art. It is operated by a diverse crew of 140 volunteers from 25 countries, offering services such as education, healthcare, and community outreach. The ship's mission is to spread hope and

  • Chinese Online School of Theology publishes annual ministry report: Expanding Chinese theological education through new strategies

    In the 2023-2024 academic year, New York-based Chinese Online School of Theology (COST) has seen significant development in expanding its ministry in theological education and mission outreach. They have promoted a series of new events and projects to explore different strategies that expand theological education for Chinese ministers. The following are some highlights from the 2023-2024 annual report:

  • Dr. Fenggang Yang: How foreign forces transformed traditional Chinese legal systems

    In a recent lecture to Chinese Christians, scholar Dr. Fenggang Yang (杨凤岗) gave an in-depth analysis of the historical evolution and contemporary significance of the modern legal system in Chinese society. He explored the tensions and integrations between traditional law and modern rule of law, highlighting the distinctive characteristics of China’s traditional legal system and emphasizing the role of foreign influences in introducing modern legal practices into Chinese society.