US Christians, Ayatollah Express Opinions Surrounding Iran Nuclear Negotiations

By Isaiah Narciso
Iran Nuclear Deal
Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Jawad Zarif (C) resume nuclear negotiations in Montreux, March 2, 2015. REUTERS/Evan Vucci/Pool

The framework for a possible landmark nuclear deal has been reached between the United States and Iran. However, it could fall apart after parties from both countries have expressed concern surrounding the terms negotiated in Switzerland on Thursday.

In a press release posted on Christian News Service by Daryl Hedding of the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, prominent Christian leaders have signed a joint letter addressed to President Barack Obama and the leaders of Congress. They also delivered a petition that was signed by more than 23,000 people that asked Iran to dismantle its nuclear program.

"I was honored to deliver the petition and leadership letter on behalf of so many Christians who understand the implications of a nuclear Iran on both America's national security and Israel, our closest, longtime ally in the Middle East," ICEJ-USA National Director Susan Michael said as she presented the petition to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

According to Hedding, ICEJ-USA collected signatures for the petition over a three-week period. Both the letter and the petition were sent to the White House, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

"The petition calls for any agreement between the United States and Iran to be based on two principles," Hedding wrote. "It must completely dismantle the Iranian regime's ability to build a nuclear bomb, and Congress must ratify any agreement proposed by the Administration with regard to Iran's nuclear program."

Hedding reported that prominent American Christian leaders signed the letter. Some of them included Dr. James C. Dobson, Rev. Kenneth Copeland, Tony Perkins and Dr. Gary L. Bauer.

"While we applaud your commitment to a diplomatic resolution that would prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, recent reports indicate the P5+1 are willing to make significant and worrisome concessions for the sake of the deal," Michael wrote in her letter.

Michael argued that many people in the United States and Israel thought the agreement was "a bad deal."

"They fear Iran cannot be trusted so long as the facilities and technology to produce nuclear weapons remain intact," Michael wrote. "The majority of both parties of Congress are concerned that this deal is a mistake."

Even some in Iran have questioned the terms outlined in the deal. According to Faith Karimi and Deirdre Walsh of CNN, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, told state-run media that the deal isn't final yet, adding that he has "never been optimistic about negotiations with the U.S."

"Everything lies in the details," Khamenei said. "The other side, which is known for backpedaling on its commitments, may want to corner our country when it comes to the specifics."

While Iran's supreme leader hasn't expressed either support or opposition to the deal yet, CNN reported that he'd rather see the agreement fail than allow it to jeopardize his country's interests.

"What has happened so far will neither guarantee the agreement itself nor its content," Khamenei said. "It will not even guarantee completion of the negotiations. Therefore, it is meaningless to congratulate me or others about it."

According to CNN, the president has tried his best to convince a skeptical Congress that the deal had stringent conditions that would ensure Iran's compliance.

"It is a good deal, a deal that meets our core objectives," Obama said on April 2. "This framework would cut off every pathway that Iran could take to develop a nuclear weapon."

CNN reported that the negotiations were significant because of the historically strained relations between the United States and Iran.

  • ‘Wang Mingdao’s Diary’ reproduction highlights complexities of contemporary Chinese Christianity

    On December 9, the China Graduate School of Theology (中国神学研究院) hosted a public lecture titled “A Courageous Witness in the Times—Launch of Wang Mingdao (王明道)’s Diary.” The lecture, themed “Faith Patterns in Beijing’s Christian Churches Through the Lens of Wang Mingdao’s Diary,” featured Dr. Ni Buxiao (倪步晓), Associate Director and Assistant Professor at the Christian Faith and Chinese Culture Research Center of Alliance Bible Seminary (建道神学院), as the keynote speaker.

  • Floating library ‘Doulos Hope’ arrives in Taiwan; spreading love and hope from a former cruise ship

    Doulos Hope, the international floating book fair ship, has returned to Taiwan and is now docked at Kaohsiung Port, open to the public from December 18, 2024, to January 12, 2025. Originally built in 1991 and renovated in 2022, the ship features over 2,000 books on various topics, including faith, science, and art. It is operated by a diverse crew of 140 volunteers from 25 countries, offering services such as education, healthcare, and community outreach. The ship's mission is to spread hope and

  • Chinese Online School of Theology publishes annual ministry report: Expanding Chinese theological education through new strategies

    In the 2023-2024 academic year, New York-based Chinese Online School of Theology (COST) has seen significant development in expanding its ministry in theological education and mission outreach. They have promoted a series of new events and projects to explore different strategies that expand theological education for Chinese ministers. The following are some highlights from the 2023-2024 annual report:

  • Dr. Fenggang Yang: How foreign forces transformed traditional Chinese legal systems

    In a recent lecture to Chinese Christians, scholar Dr. Fenggang Yang (杨凤岗) gave an in-depth analysis of the historical evolution and contemporary significance of the modern legal system in Chinese society. He explored the tensions and integrations between traditional law and modern rule of law, highlighting the distinctive characteristics of China’s traditional legal system and emphasizing the role of foreign influences in introducing modern legal practices into Chinese society.